Monthly Archives: January 2009

Where I come from…

This morning I got my quarterly update from Lancaster Mennonite High School.  It’s always a great read for me, LMHS has done some incredible work in education and passing on the Anabaptist tradition – I’m quite proud to have graduated from that school.

I’m also proud to have graduated from Eastern University (nay, College), and have been privileged to become part of that mission again as my wife and I work with Eastern’s student chaplains.  This afternoon, while I was searching for  Joe Modica (who taught me things about ministry and spirituality that I’m still putting into practice) on Google I came accross this you tube from one of Eastern’s professors who did more to shape my theological thinking than just about anyone.  Dr. Chris Hall was probably the most gifted teacher I ever learned under (and between LMH and Eastern I sat under some wonderful educators), and it’s been a source of pride for me to see his name get noticed in projects like Ancient Christian Commentary series.  At the time Chris was leading this presentation, he was the provost of Eastern, he’s now the “Chancellor.”  Joe and I aren’t really sure what that is, but we think the title becomes him.

Sadly, emedding is disabled, so you’ll have to go to youtube’s page to view it.

A Nice Gift

Two weeks ago we held our third annual retreat for Eastern University’s student chaplains.  Today I got a small package in the mail with a gift from my good friend (and Eastern’s Chaplain), Joe Modica.  It was a much appreciated (and entirely unecessary) gesture, and Joe does a good job selecting gifts which capture people’s interest.  Today I was blesse to recieve a breviary of prayers from the Missio-Dei community in Minneapolis.  As I page through the book I know I’ll find it useful, and will probably make it my prayer book for the season of Lent.  So far my biggest nit-pick is the use of sans serif fonts for the bulk of the text – I find large blocks of printed sans serif fonts a bit of a chore to read.

On the the other hand, when I opened up the title page of the book I was met with a unexpected treat – The Missio Dei Breviary is licensed under the same Creative Commons license I release all my materials under!  This means I could copy the entire book and hand it out to my whole congregation as long as I kept the authorship and publishing pages in the work.  Of course, that would cost more than purchasing the book for everyone, but it’s a nice thought.  They also use the NET Bible as their translation as they find that the free and open project adheres nicely with their own mission goals – which I appreciate (though the wording on the title page comes off a bit on the “preachy” side, but that might just be me).  I’m glad to see other CC licensed material out there for churches!

I’m quite touched by the gift, and if you’d like to see what I’ll be praying this Lent, go to thebreviary.com.

Hey, I got noticed…

You gotta love Google alerts.  The good folks at Accordance have caught wind of my conversion entry and been kind enough to address some of my thoughts personally.  One developer, David Lang, even wrote a post that is based off my entry.  I love the title, “Catechising the Recent Convert.”

Thanks Accordance, for your comments – not to mention the honor of having my remarks considered worth referencing on your blog.

Vintage E-Publishing

I saw this video on TechCrunch, it’s probably the first new report every of reading the Newspaper over the Internet. If this doesn’t convince you that the way we communicate has fundamentally changed I honestly don’t know what will.

I’ve Converted

This is my Greek Studies layout

This is my Greek Studies layout

Ever since I’ve converted to Mac it’s really only been a matter of time until I finally made the switch.  I held out as long as I could, but then my VMware Fusion installation of Windows XP died (big shock) on me and it finally pushed me over the edge.  I was going to try to hold on for another year if I could, even though I wanted to convert, but I just got tired of increasingly diminished performance and pounding a square peg in a round hole.

I’ve converted to Accordance.

There, I’ve said it.  Now I feel better.

Look. I love BibleWorks.  In fact, there are many things about BibleWorks that I’d love to see implemented in Accordance.  BibleWorks kept my love of working with Greek and Hebrew alive and well long after most pastors decide that it’s just not “their thing.”  BibleWorks is powerful stuff, the UI isn’t bad, and what you get in their default package is truly remarkable.

It just doesn’t run on Mac.  I’ve begged BW to create a Mac version for years (it’s a perfect app to use QT 4 with), but they don’t have the resources to do that and support their Windows product – and I understand.  For years on Linux I was OK with that becuase I could just fire up a Virtual Machine, or run BW on WINE at about 80% functionality with only a few crashes.  Even when I switched to Mac I was running BW on VMware Fusion, but in the end I just had to give up.  When my friend Jamison transferred his Accordance License  to me I decided it was time to switch to a application that was actually designed for the platform I’m using.

After just over a week of using it, I’ve got to say I’m impressed.  There’s been some growing pains, but I’m getting used to the UI and I’m getting better with the tools at my disposal.  I’ve got BW installed using CodeWeavers for a couple of tools, but it’s less stable than on Linux (and in BW7 the functionality under Wine drops significantly).  Here’s some thoughts so far on the switch:

  • I like how Accordance uses natural language for searches.  While having an honest-to-goodness command in BW thrills the Geek in me, I have to admit it’s easier to construct a complex search in Accordance than with BibleWorks.
  • I actually prefer the way that BibleWorks uses characters in the search string to change the context of the search.  If not character appears before the first word, it automatically realizes that you’re looking for a verse.  If a symbol appears before the first word it knows that you’re searching a word or phrase. Accordance accomplishes the same using mouse clicks, I like less mouse clicks.
  • I like the way that BibleWorks gives you the ability to have several searches open at once in different tabs, rather than windows as in Accordance.
  • I like the single window interface of BibleWorks, it’s less to keep track of.  Though I like how Accordance has an auto-info window up by default (which Bibleworks makes you switch tabs for now).
  • I like the way Accordance handles statistics, there seems to be more flexibility in how you arrange them.
  • I like how Accordance will accept just about any decent shortening of a book name as valid – whereas in BibleWorks you could only use their three character abbreviations.
  • I don’t like having to repay for modules I own in BibleWorks.  Isnt’ there a way I can transfer my BDAG license over to Accordance?  C’mon folks throw us a bone!
  • I really didn’t like paying for the NIV so I could prepare worship slides, yick.
  • I love the bang for the buck that BibleWorks gives it’s users.  Can we have the same person negotiate for both programs please?  Merge the companies and kick butt.
  • I love being able to switch layouts to match my study goals easily.  That’s just cool.
  • I’m still up in the air whether I prefer Accordance or BibleWorks for parallel version display.
  • I love the way that Accordance handles version notes.
  • I appreciate that both programs have active communities of users, because it adds so much support as you learn to use the program.
  • Accordance needs an actual editor somewhere.  The tool editor isn’t as nice as BW’s near word-processor.
  • At this point I prefer the way BW keeps search results in a box that swiches the context of the browse window when you click on each.  I think that’s less confusing than the way Accordance handles search results (throwing them into a glob and tossing them in the screen).
  • Accordance has text critical apparatus, I’ve been wanting that for years.

So, I have growing pains, but it’s worth it.  I’ll have to wait until next year to get BDAG (at this rate I may never get HALOT) for Accordance, but if I really want it I can fire-up BW and hope it doesn’t crash under CodeWeavers).  I didn’t want to switch at all this year, given the economy, but I also had to stop spending so much time trouble-shooting why my tools weren’t working.  Now I have a new piece of software to learn, and I’m more productive to boot.  It pans out in the end.

A recent itch..

Every now and again I get an itch to be doing something other than what I’m currently doing.  This isn’t because I’m feeling unfulfilled in my current calling (what my friend Frank called “Target Days” because he wants to chuck it all and go work at Target).  Rather, I get an itch because I see a need that fits a number of my gifts and skills – a need that makes me wonder, “Should I be doing that?”

Now, because I am a Christian above all else, my itches tend to make me wonder how I might be of better service to the Church Universal.  The need I see is certainly there, and there are precious few people devoted to fulfilling that need (as I perceive it) – a point which makes the itch begged to be scratched all the more.  I wonder if I shouldn’t devote myself to doing serious work on becoming a technologist who works on educating the Church in the possibilities, challenges, and risks that digital communication have for Christian ministry.

Why do I have this itch?  Well, I’m tired of hearing about churches who still don’t have e-mail (a dead medium), groan that their communications techniques (which are from the 1950′s) no longer work, and declare that they are hopelessly at a loss to figure out how to connect with people in the current cultural climate.  It’s painful for me to experience Churches, in a world of near-instant communication, who shelve questions which come up  between monthly meetings – only to forget to bring up the question in the intervening-time.  There is no reason for Churches to steer like barges, making decisions which are discussed briefly and implemented slowly (if at all).  I envision a church which is in constant communication, where conversation can be both lengthy and deep over the course of weeks.  I envision a church where votes need not wait until the next meeting of a board, but if they do wait until the next meeting each member will come with deep knowledge that springs out of on-going conversation.  In this world, it’s a need.  People move quickly, and there is no reason why we cannot move both quickly and deeply.

I’d like to see Churches learn to be in communication this way, but this is the problem.  Churches are inherantly “conservative” institutions – they don’t like change as a matter of culture (even “progressive” churches are this way). The communications revolution has changed the very way people in this culture communicate at a base level, and it leaves churches with their collective heads spinning.  This is why I’d like to be a technologist for the Church Universal.  I have no doubts that I’d convince “everyone” that these communications tools are helpful, or even useful.  I also have no doubt that I’d be able to convince people who see the communications revolution through rose-colored glasses that there are also downsides and dangers to all these technologies .  I do feel, however, that if people are given a language by which they can reflect upon and ask questions about the opportunties opened to us in this new world then the Holy Spirit can help churches dream of our hope once more – even for  this world.  I’m idealistic that way.

This is my itch, and it will probably never get scratched the way I’d like to see it scratched.  For three main reasons:

  • I can’t change the fundamental fact that I’m a pastor, this is my calling and no one who has affirmed this calling in my life has seen fit to tell me that the Holy Spirit is leading me elsewhere.  I’ve started people on a particular journey at Central Baptist, and until the leg of the journey I’ve been called to lead is complete, this is where I belong.
  • I have a fundamental lack of formal education in this area.  Yes, I’m a geek, and some uber-geeks let me know that they consider me one of their own even though I don’t know a line of C++ (for which I’m grateful).  If I wanted to introduce myself as a person who can help on technological issues in the Church, however, I’d need a lot more credentials than I can garner now.  For starters, I’d have to do some serious post-graduate work in History, Communications Theory, and Sociology before people would even begin to be remotely encouraged to listen to what I have to say.  To be honest, I feel like I  would need to take such of course of study before I can even hope to offer anything of real depth to the Church.
  • The window of opportunity to discuss these issues will be long-closed by the time I finish my call at Central, and the education I feel is needed.  Churches don’t have 10 years before they can begin developing a language with which to apply technology and the communications revolution to ministry.  Yet, that’s what it would take before I’d really feel that I could do anything more than offer people a new puddle to play in.  The Church needs more than that.

So, I will likely never scratch this itch in the way that I think it needs to be scratched, but that doesn’t mean I won’t be doing something that helps the Church more forward.  My work with ABCNJ and my trip to the Bibletech conference are examples of how I hope to be of some value.  I just know I could do more, and I’m looking forward to working with people who are actually called to do more than I am able to manage.

The Derby

I’m finally getting around to compiling some of the video I took during the Student Chaplain retreat.  This is video from our opening exercise, a Wii™ Home Run Derby.  Enjoy!

A Wonderful Image

He transforms fools

He transforms fools

If you viewed the slide-show from the retreat you’ve already seen these images, but I wanted to put them together in sequence because I find them wonderfully provoking.  As I progressed out of Evangelicalism™ one of the things I found myself coming back to again and again was the statment, “There is a difference between being a ‘fool for Christ’ and just being a fool.”  I found myself saying this because I kept on hearing 1 Corinthians 3:18-20 applied to all sorts of odd things:

  • the age of the Earth (the “wise of this world are trying to say that the Bible’s claim that the earth is 7000 years old is a lie!”)
  • the shape of the earth (“The wise of this world say the earth is a sphere, but the Bible tells us it’s flat and I believe the Bible!”)
  • the history of the United States (“the wise of this world are trying to re-write history to take away the founder’s great faith in Jesus, but we know the truth!”)
  • global warming (“the wise of this world say that we need to stop global warming, but the Bible says it’s going to be re-created anyway so why should we bother?”)

This wonderful series of image displays what I’ve often said – sometimes, we’re just plain fools and there’s no glory in it – being a fool due to our own ignorance doesn’t honor Jesus one bit.  Yet, in his grace, Jesus removes our foolishness and leads us (sometimes even bears us) along the path of his salvation.  Since I was so touched, I share it with you.

Note: Yes, I have heard all the quotes listed above, even the flat earth one

Retreat Reflections

The chaplains did some good work at the retreat

Click on this image to view a slideshow

This is belated, but I got stranded in Hershey, PA the day after the retreat so I’m sharing now.

This past weekend the Eastern University Student Chaplains held their third annual winter retreat at Central Baptist.  It’s a big weekend for me, as my wife and I were both chaplains while we were at Eastern and re-connecting with the program was high on our list of priorities once we got back into the Philly area.  It’s an additional joy for me, because I feel that my particular gifts lend well to short, intensive, learning experiences – and this annual retreat lets me develope those gifts in a forgiving setting.

As with all my teaching, I do my best not to do a lot of “pre-chewing” for people.  Part of the joy of teaching for me is hearing insights I wouldn’t have come up with, and I work that into my style.  I also refuse to pre-chew because I often have no context for what is going on in the dorms where the Chaplains serve – thus, my goal is to help the chaplains construct some “theological tools” which most Evangelicals™ are used to (if “a” happens, do “b” stuff).  Still, the “applicability” rating was the lowest score (3.97 out of 5) in the retreat responses the chaplains gave.  So we’ve got some room for improvement on that front.

One of the things I most appreciated was how the chaplains got into the opening Wii™ Home Run Derby.  They were formed into four teams, which became their small groups for the retreat, and had a two round competition.  The goal was to demonstrate how important encouragement is in a community through cheering on each contestant, which I wasn’t sure the group would get “in” to – but they went nuts.  Even better, the chaplains called upon Joe Modica (the University chaplain) to swing the wii-mote and went nuts as he proceeded to hit more home runs than any contestant (video coming soon).  It was a great opening moment, for which I’m greatful.

Small group exercises were rated higher this year than last, which was gratifying because I wrestled with their work-outs quite a bit as I wrote the materials.  Each group wrote a prayer for use on their floors which was meant to help focus residents on doing life together well – they read these prayers during Monday’s worship and I hope they do get used on their floors.

The evening session, however, continues to lag.  Between a full belly and a full schedule before the evening teaching session, folks just seem ready for a break (though, to their credit, the chaplains did have some good reflections in the evening worship).  I think we’ll keep the skits, since there’s something to be said for just having some fun with a purpose – but I’m not sure we’ll keep the same lesson-format for the evening next year.  Instead, I think we’ll do a version of evening Vespers that might include some Lectio and personal reflections.  That would limit “teaching” to two sessions, but I think it will work.  It also might be a good idea to set up some ideas that give more form to the afternoon free-time, but I’ll have to ponder that before coming to any conclusions.

So, to the chaplains, thanks for coming and giving us the privilege of being with you.   To Central Baptist, thank you for seeing my heart in this and making space for me to prepare/lead the retreat, as well as making such wonderful hospitality avaiable to a group of students you don’t really know (your hospitality was the highest response in the retreat survey).

Thought Provoking

I’ve been silient on the blog-front for a bit, and I apologize to folks who like to keep up with what I’m thinking.  I should probably blog out some of my sermon preparations each week, that would be an interesting exercise (and far warning to folks from Central who happen by).

The last couple of weeks I’ve been busy preparing for a retreat I’ll be leading for Eastern University’s student chaplains.  My wife and I were both chaplains while we were at Eastern, and the program meant a lot to us, so it’s been good to re-engage with people involved in it nowadays.

Aside from that I’ve been plowing through the McCullough’s biography of John Adams.  Time where I might have spent writing has largely gone to getting through it before the end of January (so I could other books).  It’s been time well-spent.  McCullough has done a masterful job weaving together various letters and historical reflections to string together this narrative of Adam’s life.  Personally, I would love read some of the period newspapers he must have researched!

I have a strong affection for John Adams, probably because I share a similar temperment to his own (stubborn, sometimes hot under the collar, with equal desire to form deep friendships and accomplish something “great”).  Adams, perhaps, was one of the best people of his era – rising above party rancour and securing an honorable peace with France even at the expense of his career (a career without honor would have been unthinkable to Adams).  He knew pain and hurt, yet never ceased his longing desire to love and be loved – there is, frankly, a lot to be learned by this man who has too often only remembered for departing Washington quietly on the day Jefferson was inaugorated.

In reading this biography I’ve come to understand that Adams shed more wisdom for posterity in the margins of his books than I offer week after week in sermons after sermon.  This was a man who knew Greek and Latin, learned French and Dutch “on the job,” and had an interested in the Classics, English Poetry, Agriculture, Philosophy, and Law – and could switch between them at will.

Towards the end of McCullough’s work he quotes a margin-comment from an unnamed book  from Adam’s library that struck me as particularly thought-provoking,

“Admire and adore the Author of the telescopic universe, love and esteem the work, do all in your power to lessen ill, and increase good, but never assume to comprehend.”

Adams, nearly 200 years ago penned a thought that almost prophetically unveiled the malaise of the Modern West – a profound lack of mystery.  Adams was no mental slouch, and was instrumental in helping found a philosophical society in Boston, and yet he never once believed that he had things “figured out.”  He’d suffered too much, seen too much of the world, and knew his own heart too well to make such a claim.  He was comfortable with the idea of mystery, that there were things he’d never comprehand – and rather than lead him into bitterness, it gave him comfort and hope – actually empowering him to put his advise into practice throughout his life.  What a lesson to learn!

Read this biography, it is richly rewarding.