Category Archives: Reviews

I like reviewing things. I hope you enjoy reading reviews (if not, you clicked the wrong link).

Star Trek: Into Old Plotlines

Before I begin my thoughts on Star Trek: Into Darkness, please let me state clearly, “There will be spoilers.”  Keep reading if you want, but don’t blame me if I reveal a plot point you haven’t seen yet.

When my daughter saw that the newest Star Trek movie was coming out around her birthday, she insisted that seeing it become part of her birthday celebration.  It didn’t any arm-twisting to get me to agree to the request.  I would have gone to see it anyway.  I had very high hopes for Into Darkness going into the film.  I thought the initial reboot movie was a lot of fun, lens flares aside, and I was looking forward to seeing what JJ Abrams would do with the franchise now that the bridge movie had been successful.  While I left the movie entertained, it wasn’t what I was hoping for.

Now, there is a typical reaction that people who are fans of the original, or “Prime,” universe must automatically fault the Abrams reboot.  I’m not one of those people.  The first movie so clearly created it’s own reality that I was excited to see how they’d keep the familiar forms in their new universe.  Given that the look of our technology is actually more “futuristic” than that props of the original series, or even Next Generation, by this point the new direction was a breath of fresh air.  I’m also a JJ Abrams fan in general, and I enjoy the blend of action and thought in his films and TV shows.

So, my saying  I was disappointed by Into Darkness is not because I felt it undermined my beloved archetypes.  In fact, I enjoyed his take on Kahn and the final act of self-sacrifice by which the ship was saved. Giving Spock the iconic “Kahhhhhnnn!” line was a genius way of making that character be more in touch with his human side.  My major disappointment sprang from how many archetypes JJ Abrams crammed into the film.  There was no need to shove a Tribble into sick-bay, or for Dr. McCoy to reference doing a c-section on a Gorn.  The gratuitous references only served to tie the Abrams reboot to the memory of the Prime universe.  While I appreciate the nod in the direction of long-time fans, I really wanted JJ Abrams to go off on his own direction.  Perhaps the most glaring of these Prime loaners was Spock’s use of the “Needs of the many” quote (which actually adorned a poster).  It felt more like a photobomb sent in from the Prime universe instead of a line Spock would have said in that moment of the story – as if the Spock from Wrath of Kahn was jumping around in the back of the set yelling, “Hey, our second film had Kahn in it too!”  Any two or three of these would have been fine.  The inclusion of Kahn was handled very well, and the Gorn line gave McCoy a chance to shine in a film where he’s horribly under-utilized.  Jettison the tribble and the other photobombed lines and I think the movie would have become better.  Abrams doesn’t need to cater to old fans, he needs to focus on making new ones.

I might have felt better about the movie had the plot been more solid, and less cliche.  Admiral Marcus was a cartoon-character of an adversary – little more than a Daily Show caricature  of Dick Cheney in a bad outfit.  The character was cold, paranoid, and ethically deficient.  While I might wonder how such a person rose to become the head of the fleet, the version of Starfleet presented in the film is so unstable I find his presence a bit more plausible.  Characters rise and fall in rank with almost comical speed, and the ineptness of Starfleet in Into Darkness a joke used to create convenient plot-points.  As in, “He knows the top officers will be meeting in this room, right now….”  That’s just plain dumb.

The plot had transparencies so blatent it was sad to see them in action (“The tribble will live, I tell you, live!”).  It also had holes in it which were so large the Enterprise-E could have flown through them.  How is the Enterprise able to sail through the Neutral Zone without even an hint of detection?  They were heading for Kronos. Also, how was the enterprise able to send a transmission to New Vulcan when they couldn’t even contact Earth from orbit around the Moon?  I know the captains of the ships were all incapacitated by the above alluded-to assault, but none of the other ships in Starfleet were stationed around Earth going, “Hey, what’s the unidentified vessel doing there attacking our flag ship?”  Speaking of the plot, just watch the last half of Star Trek: Nemisis and you’ve pretty much seen it.

In all, I was entertained by the movie, but I wasn’t impressed by it. Had I known what I knew above I would have been quite content to wait until it came out on RedBox.  Despite it’s strong points, it simply wasn’t worth the expense of the theatre.

Look Ma, No Wires!

My son dressed up

Harry Potter apparently lives at my house

I was given a wonderful present for my birthday, a first generation Canon EOS Rebel DSLR. It's my first “real” camera, and getting a DSLR for free took away the obstacle of, “How can I justify getting a camera I don't even know how to use?” Now I can learn on a great device, and if/when I out-grow it I can always move up to a newer model.

I love using the camera, the ability to do depth of field, manually focus, and set my shutter speed and f-stop make taking pictures a lot of fun. White balance is difficult, and I don't much care for the “auto” settings, but I'll learn. In fact, after owning the camera for a couple of weeks there was only one thing which bugged me.

Wires.

Ever since I got a smart phone my point and shoot had been all but retired. Aside from the convenience of the form-factor, the ability to move images off my phone without wires was super appealing – especially after Photostream debuted (even if it can be a bit confusing). With the Canon, though, I either had to pop out the memory card or plug a USB cable in order to retrieve images from the device. I didn't like this even a little bit. Even worse, the camera takes compact flash memory, which meant my MacBook's built-in SD slot was useless. I needed a card reader. How 2003!

This led me to seek a solution for my wire problem. I was familiar with eye-fi, an SD card with wifi and GPS on it – so I went searching for something similar in compact flash format. Instead, I found something I'd never seen, an SD to compact flash adapter. It didn't take me long to figure out the adapter worked with eye-fi cards, so off my went my order to Amazon. I chose to order the 8GB pro x2 card, because it came with GPS included and could also transfer Raw images wirelessly.

The card arrived today, and after some testing, I had it transferring images from the DSLR to my MacBook, Nexus 7, and iPad. It's pretty amazing to have my camera send the pictures to my devices, and I can set it up to transfer only images I mark as “protected” on the camera. Additionally, when I transfer the images to a mobile device I can have them automatically transferred to my MacBook as well (though on the iPad this doesn't make much sense given the presence of Photostream). I don't know what impact this is going to have on battery life. I know it will certainly have some, but eye-fi seems to have done a stellar job implementing power management on the card.

Configuring the card requires either a Mac or windows computer, also, the eye-fi cards needs to be inserted into the SD card reader which came in the package, without it the card cannot be set up. While this is a pain, and a non-starter for people who have gone entirely mobile, I understand the limitation. Configuring the card via an on-board interface might be too much for to ask for such a compact device. The card also requires users to set up for an account with the eye-fi service. This is used to upload images temporarily to their web-service, as well as for pairing different devices with the card. This web-service keeps photos online for seven days (it can also be disabled), where they can be shared and downloaded. Long-term storage in eye-fi's system costs $49.99 a year and includes unlimited storage – that isn't a bad deal for a cloud backup of every image taken with a camera! In addition to eye-fi's service, users may also set the card to upload images to a variety of web sharing sites – including Flickr, Facebook, and Picasa.

My one issue with the eye-fi mobile apps is the location data obtained by GPS doesn't seem to be applied to the pictures. I noticed this on the desktop manager as well, pictures would appear in the manager and it would take a bit for the location data to be applied. This is because the geotagging seems to be accomplished on eye-fi's servers, but I do hope the ability to have the geotagging data applied to the photos comes to the mobile apps soon. It is, after all, one of the reasons I purchased the more expensive card. Also, the lack if geotagging data on the photos imported to iOS makes Photostream less useful – it seems to get the location data images have to be passed through the desktop software, or downloaded from eye-fi's web-site. This is kind of a bummer. If the eye-fi app can't apply the geotagging data to my images I'd almost rather it not add them to Photostream. I could simply automatically upload my images to the Mac when I returned to it. That way all the data would be attached to my photos, and I wouldn't end up with multiple copies of the same image. I can turn on the automatic upload, but keeping eye-fi images off Photostream isn't something I've figured out yet. I could turn Photostream off completely, but it's an essential part of my iPhone workflow at this point.

Despite this hiccup, I am quite pleased with the card thus far. If you use a DSLR and have been looking for a way to avoid wires when transferring you images, this is a stellar solution.

 

Nexus 7 – Being Productive

Last week, I found a decent markdown app for android. Because of this, I decided to connect my Bluetooth keyboard to my Nexus 7 this week and write my sermon on it. While I’m still not happy with with the workflow I need to use, the experience wasn’t at all painful.

Fun With Keyboards

First, the keyboard support in Android is  outstanding.  This is one place I’ve always felt iOS was lacking, and my Nexus 7 experience has confirmed it.  Typical character formatting shortcuts work. Control-b sets the bold toggle, control-i sets italic, and so on.  Finding the control key on my Mac keyboard was a bit finger-tying, but I acclimated quickly. I did find it odd, however, that Mac-style shortcuts worked in other parts of the system. For example, Command-tab activates the application switcher. The command key is also used to activate default Google apps. My favorite is command-t, which opens Google Talk’s main screen. This makes switching between chats easy – command-t opens the chat main screen and arrow keys can be used to select another chat, which is then activated by hitting return. This, combined with Android’s stellar notifications, made using Google Talk on my Nexus 7 a wonderful experience.

Writing

Writing my sermon on Nexus was, acceptable. While the markdown editor I’m using is decent, it’s no where near the standard I’m accustomed to on iOS in WriteUp and ByWord. Write does have persistent word count, which is an essential feature for me, but it’s lacks extra formatting buttons for quickly adding markdown to text. It also relies on Android’s sharing feature to save to dropbox, which works but can be horribly frustrating as I end up being to do something I have no desire to do – keep a “local” and “cloud” version of my document in sync. My iOS editors, on the other hand keep my documents automatically in sync. I much prefer the iOS behavior. I could * write in a word processor app which saves directly to dropbox or Google Drive, but I write in markdown because the files are plain text. In a normal word processor I need to worry about which file format in which I’m saving, *and which application will read it on my devices. Plain text, on the other hand, works anywhere. My workflow is specialized, however, most users would be quite happy using one of Android’s word processing apps.

Conclusion

I was quite happy using my Nexus 7 for my writing this week. The keyboard controls are amazing and the apps are capable. My workflow currently doesn’t seem to match the design philosophy of Android, however, and this made my writing more scattered than I like. If you typically write in a traditional word processor, though, you could be well-served with this device.

Continuing with the Nexus 7

image

I’ve been using the Nexus 7 for a couple of weeks so I  want to share some thoughts on how its been going. Over all, I continue to really like the tablet. My only nag on the hardware is the layout of the volume rocker and sleep/wake button. They are placed so close together I often find myself putting the device to sleep when I want to change the volume. Read on for my other thoughts.

Media Consumer

I’ve been using the Nexus almost exclusively for media consumption the last couple of weeks and its been great. One of the issues I have with my iPad is the need to go through iTunes to add media to the device. On the Nexus the file system adding media can be done several ways.

First, the Android File Transfer App allows the Nexus to be connected to a Mac via USB. Adding files is a matter of dragging and dropping.  Second, the open filesystem on Android allows me to save any file on dropbox to the device. iOS places limits on what can or cannot be easily added to an “iDevice.” Third, using a USB to go cable allows the Nexus to act as a USB host. This allows thumb drives, and even some portable hard drives, to be connected directly to the device. The camera connection kit ads similar functionality to iOS devices, but the closed filesystem limits what types of files can be added.

The ease of adding media to the Nexus makes it an ideal consumption device.

Gaming

Android does have good games, and I’ve been enjoying some for about a week. The ability to connect a game controller only adds to the experience. Even with on-screen controls games are responsive and animations are smooth. It would be even better if I could mirror the Nexus screen to a TV.

Productivity

When I first got the Nexus I was disappointed at the productivity tools for Android. My preferred work flow is to write in markdown and have my work automatically synced to a dropbox folder. When I first got on the Google Play store the crop of markdown editors was rather slim. Most didn’t recognize the .md extension common to markdown files, had limited dropbox support, and couldn’t export HTML from the app.

I finally found a passable editor called Write. The dropbox support is clunky, files have to be imported from the dropbox app and then shared back, but it exports clean HTML and has a persistent word count.

The mobile office suites on Android are a mixed bag. I’m a Documents to Go user on iOS, but the Android version was so awful I asked for a refund. Quick Office has better file management setup, but the editor only has a page layout view. On the 7 inch Nexus screen, this makes text look far too small to be a comfortable editing environment. On spreadsheets this isn’t as much of a issue, but the word processor is really difficult to use. Quick Office also, for some inexplicable reason, doesn’t have a way to select all text. This boggles my mind.

Of all the suites I’ve used on Android so far, SoftMaker is the most powerful, but it’s Google Drive integration is currently broken. In all, I hope SoftMaker fixes it’s GoogleDrive integration – it’s a solid app.

In another productivity realm, I’m still looking for an app comparable to Notability or Notes + on Android. Nothing I’ve found even comes close. Papyrus is capable, but it’s not as easy to use add its iOS cousins.

For productivity, I continue to see the open filesystem as a mixed blessing. While I appreciate the ease through which I can add media to my Nexus, I have to say I like the sand boxing of iOS better for productivity work. Cloud integration on iOS  “just works” – in Android every app tends to use the cloud differently and the integration is usually only partially implemented.

Conclusion

The Nexus made a good first impression and continues to grow on me. The immaturity of the productivity apps show when I’m trying to get work done, but the ecosystem shows signs of maturing. I still like 4:3 better for a productivity device, but the Nexus could be the sign off things to come.

A day with the Nexus 7

image

This week I picked up a nexus 7. After spending a day with it I can say, “This is a slick device.” Let me share some of the ups and downs I’ve had in the day I’ve used it.

The good

The first thing I love about the nexus 7 is the hardware. This device just “feels right” to hold and use. The screen is brilliant, and the dimpled back makes it easy to hold. The device is inexpensive, but it doesn’t feel cheap.

There are also a lot of features I love about Android jelly bean. Task management is STELLAR, and notifications are very nice as well. The way Jelly Bean’s launcher is customizable is also wonderful. The task switching and management are, in particular, well beyond anything Apple has done.
Being able to swipe the keyboard to type is also amazing (I’m typing this post that way right now). It takes some getting used to, but the more I use it the faster I get.

Google integration is also great, if also a bit creepy. I no sooner set up my nexus 7 when I started getting chat notifications from a friend of mine. That threw me for a loop! While creepy, its also useful. My calendar immediately loaded into the application, which also puts iOS to shame, and adding dates is incredibly simple. Google+ integration is also well done, though I do think the iOS app is a bit better (update, after updating my apps, Google+ on Android is every bit as wonderful as on iOS).

I also have to give props on the battery life, I’ve been using my nexus all day and still have 17% left in the tank, that’s very good. No need to worry about needing to charge in the middle of the day.

The not so good

As good as Jelly Bean is it still isn’t as easy to use as iOS. The best way I can put it is, “When I’m using it for productivity purposes it feels more like a traditional computer than a tablet.” People have complained about Apple not opening the filesystem on iPod devices since their inception, but as I use the nexus I think they might be right to keep it off limits. The filesystem on the nexus is, for example, called, “SD Card.” I understand that means “local storage,” but a normal user might start poking for the SD card slot, or panic because they don’t have an SD card to put into the device (which doesn’t take one). It’s the type of cryptic notation I expect on a traditional computer, but not a tablet.

Also, the way files are handled, and apps are registered to handle them, seems off. Out of the box the nexus has Google play books installed, to which I added both kindle and nook readers. I then tried to open an epub from dropbox and was told I didn’t have an app able to open that type of file even though I knew I had two. It turns out that nook, Google play books, and kindle don’t want books to be loaded in by alternate methods, so they don’t register as being able to open eBook files – and there is no simple way to tell them to do so. This also hit me with markdown files which have an “.md” extension. The markdown apps I’ve discovered all save with “.txt” as their extension, and don’t register as opening the other designation. Despite the fact that markdown is plain text, Jelly Bean refuses to open the files. Now, this is as much the responsibility of the developers as anyone, but with an open filesystem it would be nice to have the option to set applications for certain extensions.

The nexus 7 also lacks miracast support, so connecting to a TV or projector is not easily done. On the plus side, I might have to pick up a raspberry pi to see if I can hack it to be a wireless display adapter for presentations, as the nexus 7 would make a great speaking device. I realize I could have gotten a kindle fire or nook hd to get video out, but I wanted the plain Android experience my first time out. I knew the device didn’t support video out when I purchased it, so it wasn’t a shock, just a bit of a bummer.

A good many people are hoping Apple makes the next iPad into a 16:9 device. After using the nexus for a day I have to say I am not one of them. For media consumption, 16:9 is amazing. For productivity, however, 4:3 simply feels less cramped.

The unhappy

A lot is said about the app ecosystems of both Android and iOS. The assumption has been that iOS apps are more plentiful, better to look at, and easier to use. I have to say I’m a bit underwhelmed by the app selection in the Google play store. My workflow for writing is to create in markdown, and have it saved to a dropbox folder where I can edit it on any other device. Currently, there is no app which will do this as far as I can tell. Some come close, but are hindered by not handling sub-directories and not recognizing the .md extension (which I find especially odd). The is also nothing quite like notability in the play store. Papyrus and lecture notes come close, but neither allows for the type of effortless writing I’m used to on my iPad. This may be because android developers tend to assume anyone writing on an Android device will have an active pen with which to write, which I don’t have. On this later point I will have to keep playing and see if I can get used to it.

The way Android handles notifications is wonderful, but it’s also a bit haunted. When I finally installed overdrive to handle epubs, for example, tapping an epub notification causes it to disappear for me, while for a friend it gives him an option to open the book. I know I must have something mis- configured, but I simply can’t find it (any advice would be welcome).

Conclusion

The nexus 7 is a beautiful device and is fun to use. At the moment I’d say it’s best suited for media consumption, rather than productivity. This is partly due to hardware limitations, the lack of miracast or video-out being key. It is also partly to the current lack of apps to support a flexible work-flow. I’m sure this will change in time, but right now work still needs to be done.

I am, however, in love with the smaller form-factor. If/when Apple comes out with a retina iPad mini, that will replace my larger iPad. For now, the nexus is a fun device that can teach Apple a thing or two. I’m glad to have it, and will continue to play with it.

What a way to end Summer

Bruce Springsteen Stage

My view of the stage

Shortly before I returned from vacation I received an email from my church treasurer. It had some updates on ongoing projects, nothing out of the ordinary. The last line, however, stood out. It said, “I would also like for you to be my guest at the Bruce Springsteen concert on September 2.” Accepting the invitation was a no-brainer.

Now, I'm not much of a concert-goer. Actually, I'm not much of a music-listener at all. I find listening to music too distracting when I'm trying to write, read, or do other work. As such, I don't find much time to partake. I appreciate good music, and I love to sing, but listening is not one of my frequent pass-times. Since I've been at Central, however, Larry has shared his love of Bruce's music with me. He's shared books on the Catholic themes found in his music, posited that we should get the choir or band to play some of his music during worship, and even purchased “Wrecking Ball” for me this past spring. Before meeting Larry, Bruce Springsteen had always been a cultural force I was aware of, but not one I truly appreciated. After years of being introduced to the depth of Springsteen's music, I can say I'm beginning to appreciate his artistry. Wrecking Ball, in particular, is an album I've listened to over and over and over again. With Larry, I think our Church should be introduced to Rocky Ground at some point. My growing appreciation for Bruce's music meant that, if I were go to any concert, it would be his.

Technicals

I had never been to a concert at Citizen's Bank Park, so I didn't know what to expect when I arrived. The setup was impressive. Most of center field was filled by a massive stage and three screens. Ramps travelled down from the stage at the front and sides for Bruce and other band members to travel upon during the concert. The lighting and speaker rigs which adorned to structure were equally large. The lighting platform over the front of the stage actually held four or five people inside it's triangular frame. These guys climbed to the platform on metal “rope-ladders” and remained up there the entire show. It would not be a job I would want, especially given the humidity of the night – the heat on that platform has to be insane.

The sound system was adequate, but the treble was up too high. Bruce uses an impressive brass section, as well as some strings, in his music – which is one of most attractive points of the sound for me. In the concert, however, the over-loaded treble occasionally transformed the string and brass instruments into little more than white noise. As far as a stadium concert goes it wasn't terrible, but even Larry said he'd never heard the sound set up like that before.

Bruce's shows aren't about wowing people with gimmicky visuals, and the lighting choices reflected his style. The lighting was very good, and played with the music seamlessly. Actually, the lighting blended in with the show so well I forgot it was there most of the time. That's probably the best compliment I can give to the lighting director, it “just worked.”

The performance

Bruce Springsteen is insane.

There was no opening act, just Bruce listed at 7:30PM. He began about 30 minutes after the scheduled start, and played until just before midnight. Without a break. During songs he weaved in and out of the crowd to several platforms set up in the field. He interacted with the audience, and even paid compliments to folks as he passed them. At one point even he was taken aback a bit by the sight of a baby adorned in green ear protectors, “Hey look, there's a baby here!” he shouted.

As Bruce went around the crowd he began collecting people's signs, which I had never seen before. A bit later in the show he began to page through them, making comments – when he came across a sign with the name of a song he would show it to the band, prop the sign on his microphone, and sing it. About one song, “Rockin' at Night” he declared, “I don't think we've sung that in 25 years, but I bet we can still play it.” After working on some cords with the band, play it he did. From memory. After 25 years. Wow.

Bruce's comfort on the stage is what makes him such a good show-man. He loves interacting with the crowd, his band-mates, and has no problems going “off-script.” As he worked out “Rockin' at Night,” for example, he spent a good two or three minutes simply working with the band on the progression. Even as he did so, he was still very much present to the audience. He even kept a running commentary while he went through. Rather than being a moment of boredom, it became a brief moment of insight into how the band works together. Performers who are less sure of themselves, would never ad lib in that way – Bruce is so prepared he made it look planned.

The concert set ended around 10:30 or so with a bow and a brief moment of darkness. Then began the encore, which ended around 11:50. His encore was longer than some band's shows. By the end of the night, he was still jogging, crowd-surfing, dancing, and playing with the audience. Citizen's Bank Park turned on the lights three songs into the encore, but it did little to slow the party down. In fact, the sudden day-glow on the field actually seemed to draw Bruce out into the audience more. During “Tenth Avenue Freeze Out” Bruce was 25-30 yards from the main stage, performing flawlessly with his distant bandmates. Then, at the line, “And the Big Man joined the Band” everything paused for a video tribute to Clarence Clemmons – 3 ½ hours in the show, the crowd took their roar up a notch.

Phildalephia was one of the first cities, to embrace Springsteen's music, and decades later that bond still shows. During “Wrecking Ball” his lines about the Giants were lustily booed by the Philly crowd, and you could see Bruce laugh heartily at the response. Even though the song is about the destruction of the Meadowlands, during the performance he made sure to show a video of the demolition of Veteran's Stadium. He did say, “The Spectrum” in reference to it – but as I think it was his only mistake all night I'll let it pass. Knowing the iconic structure was part of his audience's memory, and seeing that it was paid tribute too, demonstrated the link Philly has with him.

Theology

Theology at a “secular” concert? Heck ya.

Bruce's music is rife with Catholic imagery and eschatological hope. During the concert he frequently made reference to “ghosts,” which were all those good things in the past which are lost to us and yet still part of us. The value of the the “ghosts” for Bruce, was the memory and presence of love. The echo of the “cloud of witnesses” was palpable.

Prior to performing “Spirit of the Night” Bruce took on the persona of a black preacher, and the audience a congregation. He shouted, “Can you feel the spirit?” The crowd roared back in affirmation. At this moment my theological mind kicked in – I looked around at the crowd lost in ecstasy and thought, “This is a moment of transcendance for a lot of these people.”

After the main set ended with “Land of Hopes and Dreams” Bruce came back and spoke of the “train” which is coming, and has been talked about for centuries, but never seems to get here. To help make sense of it, he remarked at how we went back to explore some of the people who had talked about the “train” over the years. These reflections led to the song, “We Are Alive.” This song continues the strong allusions to the cloud of witnesses, adding to them a vague hope of resurrection. “We Are Alive” is my favorite song in the Wrecking Ball album.

Conclusion

As I wrote in the previous section, attending a Bruce Springsteen concert is a a moment of trascendance for many in attendance. People come expecting an experience, and they recieve one. For many, Springsteen's spiritual musings may be the most religious thing they do all year, even for the church-goers in the audience.

Since the arrival of the entertainment culture in the 20th Century Churches have struggled with this transcendant expectation. Religious euphoria seems to be a built-in need for human-beings, and it seems that sports, movies, or a rock concert fill that need as good as any religious service. I'm sure many would say it fulfills the need better than any religious service.

In response, churches have tried to capture the religious euphoria of entertainment. Sanctuaries have become concert halls, sermons sound like the pre-game shows on FOX sports, and Sunday performances strive to capture the melodrama of the movies. “Contemporary” churches seem to be, in fact, the only ones which are growing.

As I enjoyed Bruce Springsteen on Sunday night, however, I saw again the folly of this religious response to the entertainment culture. As much as people did experience a taste of transcendance at the Ballpark, it was the fabrication of lights, sound, and the personality of Bruce which lead them there. People came expecting to have Bruce take them somewhere, and he did.

Many people come to church without any such expectations. They come expecting to sing some songs they like, hear a sermon they don't hate, and drop some money in the plate. Many “strong Christians” come to worship on Sunday out of grudging obligation instead of hopeful expectation. Even when people come to church in expectation they tend to come with the same mentality of a concert-goer. They come expecting the band, choir, dancers, pastor to take them somewhere. If they don't go anywhere – then those performers failed to deliver.

Worship, however, shouldn't be dependent on the people “up front” to take the congregation places. In fact the band, choir, organist, dancers, and pastors are actually supposed to be on the same journey as the congregation-at-large. When we come to worship looking for a transcendant experience, it shouldn't be based on the things we've set up. Rather, our hope to capture a glimpse of what Bruce calls, “the train which is always coming” needs to fall upon our Savior. Through the Spirit we can be taken places in worship, hear the “train” coming, and maybe participate in proclaiming it ourselves.

Seeing Bruce Springsteen in concert was an incredible way to end the Summer, and the experience has reminded me just how much the Church has to re-learn.

 

Blue Like Jazz – at last an artistic Christian film

I’ve noticed a trend of Christian films which have tried to be “edgy” over the last few years. Some, like the dreadful Fireproof, have not only failed to be edgy films – they have failed on nearly every film-making category imaginable. Other films, such as Second Chance and To Save a Life, have managed to capture some real life angst. Second Chance was, unfortunately, held back by the fact that Michael W. Smith has a difficult time being anyone other than himself. It did, however, manage to offer a decent critique of America’s “bigger is better” version of the Church. To Save a Life dealt with some significant teen issues (the lead character, gasp, has pre-marital sex) and tries to handle a character’s transition into faith with some integrity. It fell short, however, in it’s use of cheesy “four spiritual laws” interludes and some cliche moments (the pastor’s Son is a druggie, haven’t seen that before).

These films never quite managed to get to the realm of “edgy” perhaps because they weren’t trying to tell a story, but to preach a point. Second Chance deserves better company, but gets tossed in because it made use of an Evangelical Culture icon as a hook – and it wasn’t necessary to do so. Fireproof seemed to have characters who existed only to preach a sermon and then walk off camera, never to be seen again. To Save a Life reduced the powerful story of a high school senior facing his own guilt over abandoning a friend and impregnating his girlfriend as he began to embrace the faith to a tract. One tried to tell Christians, “See, we can be artistic too” and the other two devolved into evangelistic crusades. Actually, Fireproof had never actually evolved in the first place, that flick should only be watched with a Riff Trax. Sadly, one does not yet exist.

Then along comes the film Blue Like Jazz. Based on Donald Miller’s book of the same name, Blue Like Jazz finally manages to leave behind both the “us too-ism” of so much Christian art and the “get ‘em saved” mentality of an evangelistic crusade. The result is a film that isn’t “edgy,” but transcends the gimmick in order to become “art.” Steve Taylor, who also the force behind Second Chance, has put together a film which finally depicts a crisis of faith in a way which finally rings true. Amazingly, the movie manages to hold on to a main theme from the book, “Jazz, like life, doesn’t resolve.” In similar fashion, the resolution of the film is unresolved. It is the beginning of Don’s new faith journey, rather than the solution to all the conflicts he confronts throughout the story.

Blue Like Jazz breaks from it’s evangelical roots in other ways. Instead of masking language, and other social practices common to the college atmosphere (and Reed, in particular) it shows them as part of that world. As Don proceeds through his crisis of faith he blends in to the culture surrounding him and partakes of all the vices introduced to him. This isn’t depicted as “Don rebelling” but as “Don exploring a different world.” When Don comforts his lesbian friend and asks if she would consider “putting out” it fits the story. When Don is confronted by a scheme of the “Pope” and responds with, “I need a beer” it feels like that’s what Don would do at that point. The authenticity of these moments are important – they aren’t gimmicks but artistic decisions so the story can be authentically told. Without this authenticity the beginning of Don’s new spiritual journey would have come off sounding like its “evangelistic tract” predecessors. By managing to to deal honestly with the characters, Blue Like Jazz at last depicts a faith journey through the art of film.

Fans of the book will quickly realize that film is its own entity. In the book Donald Miller becomes part of a small underground Christian group on Reed which suffers the ire of the student body not infrequently. In the movie Don’s faith is in absolute crisis for much of the story and never joins the Christian underground. The shift is notable, but wise. In the book the suffering the small group of believers experiences is set in the context of Don’s inner thoughts – and in them we find sorrow and compassion for the people who are treating the group poorly. The movie wouldn’t have been able to reveal those thoughts, and may have succumbed to an “us versus them” mentality in which Christians would be sanctimoniously throught of as “the good guys.” By placing Don outside the faith for much of the story many of the same themes explored in the book were still present, but from a perspective which managed to make Don’s journey “the story of us” instead of “the story of us versus them.”

I highly recommend this film, and would love to explore both the book and film in a group discussion at some point. If you have religious scruples about seeing swearing, sex, and drugs on screen be prepared to be ruffled a bit – none of the above is gratuitous but it’s there. I wouldn’t let my daughter see this film quite yet, but in a few years I would like to sit down with her and the the youth group as an exploration of a faith journey passing through crisis. Check it out.

Simply the Nook

Nook Simple Touch box

I received my Father’s Day present a bit early this year. My wife let it slip that she was planning on getting me an eReader as a present, and had to pick the model I wanted. Thanks to some sleuthing I managed to track down a Nook Simple Touch with Glow Light at a local Target, and off we went to pick it up. I just finished my first book on the device, Prisoner of Azkaban, and have some thoughts on the device.

First, I was impressed as soon as I went to open the packaging. The Nook comes in a minimalist package that is both beautiful and incredibly easy to open. The box has two flaps, one which contains the power adapter and usb cable and the other which contains the Nook and a colorful quick start guide. In a world where device makers think of packaging as a shipping container, it’s clear that Barnes and Noble wanted their device to be presented as a work of art – their eye for detail pays off.

The device itself deserves such a presentation. It is thin, feather-light, and a joy to hold. The front of the Nook holds four buttons to control page turns. The buttons can be set up to allow the device to be controlled left or right handed. Being left-handed, this is a feature I appreciate. Apart from the control buttons, the front of the Nook has home button in shape of Nook’s distinctive “n” branding. On the back of the device is a power button, and on the bottom edge is a micro-usb port for charging and syncing. The right edge has a flap which reveals the mico-sd slot for expanded memory. All in all the hardware is elegantly minimalist. It looks elegant.

The touch screen isn’t as responsive as a capacitive LCD screen – but that’s a limitation of eInk as much as the device itself. Even with the slower refresh rate on the screen, the user interface is simple and well-implemented. In fact, the layout is so good that my mind expects that the Nook is more than an eReader. The system is responsive enough that i wouldn’t mind typing an email on it if a client was ever provided for it. Being left-handed, I tend not to use the touch screen to flip pages in books, but on the occasions when I’ve done so I’ve been impressed with how well it works.

The display itself is stunning. The agonizingly slow refresh rates of early eInk displays are a think of the past. In fact, the Nook Simple Touch even manages to avoid the massive screen blackout which plagued earlier displays. While I never felt I had a problem reading on an LCD screen, I was stunned by how my eyes took to reading the eInk. In fact, I felt I could read a much smaller font-size on the Nook than I can on my iPad. The killer feature of this Nook model, however, is the glow light. Holding down the home button for two seconds engages the light, which bathes the display in a soft light. The light can be adjusted for brightness via a menu accessed in the status bar. The Nook with glow light is extremely difficult to find (our local Barnes and Noble has a waiting list of about 80 names), and having used the light I can see why. The light completely lights up the text, but manages to do so without overpowering the eyes.

Reading on the Nook is a pleasant experience. I’d never complained about reading on my iPad, but after reading a book on handed on the Nook I can’t see myself using the iPad as my primary reader. In fact, after using the Nook to read in bed I’m tempted to say the reading experience is better on this device than a paper book. I don’t miss the hand cramps which come from trying to hold a book open!

If you’re in the market for an eBook reader, the Nook Simple Touch with glow light is a great choice. In fact, the combination of hardware, display, and ease of use might make it the choice.

Mobile Suite Showdown – Importing and Exporting

Productivity apps on the iPad continue to be one of the top selling points for the device. It’s no surprise, then, that there are several office suites available in the App Store. This post is going to explore the three main “all in one” suites which are available on the iPad – Documents to Go, Quick Office, and Office2 HD. Apple’s iWork is also available in the App store, but the “separate app” nature of the suite sets it outside the scope of this comparison.

Today we’ll be looking at the fourth, and final, comparison – importing and exporting. Each suite will be reviewed on both how they deal with data both on a local network and to the cloud.

Quick Office HD

One of the selling points for Quick Office is the ease of which documents can be uploaded to, and retrieved from, computers on the local network via a built-in file transfer interface. This setting can be toggled by tapping the gear button in the file screen and toggling the “file transfer” option. Turning the option on will reveal an ip address which can be used to acces files which are locally stored inside Quick Office. For additional (or, really, any) security an added authentication option can be toggled which will require users to input a user and password combination before connecting. It’s a good idea to make sure this is on. Once file transfers are enabled, users can access Quick Office’s files (for locally stored files only) though a simple web-interface, or by connecting to the server through the finder or windows explorer. In my experiments with Quick Office I found that the file transfer server will disconnect a finder connection when switching to another app on the iPad – this is probably a limitation of iOS.

Quick Office HD also has an impressive number of options available for storing documents in the cloud. Aside from the “big three” of Dropbox, Google Docs, and Box – Quick Office also allows to connections to Sugar Sync, Evernote, and several more. Connections to these services benefit from Quick Office’s excellent file managment tools, however features which are unique to each service are not implemented. This is especially true for the lack of “starred documents” in Google Docs.

Documents imported into Quick Office are handled well – even supporting elements such as outlines, which cannot be generated by the suite itself. Quick Office will also display unrecognized fonts in a default sans serif face without stripping the font information from the actual document. The suite handles spreadsheets well, but my two test presentations suffered from lost formatting and stripped animations.

Office2 HD

As with Quick Office, HD Office2 HD has a built-in file transfer option. This can be access by tapping the gear button in the lower left of the file management screen and toggling “Enable File Sharing.” Similarly, security can also be enabled for this feature. While Quick Office has a colorful and well-thought out web interface, Office2 HD brings up a plain list hyper-links with an upload button at the bottom of the page (which you will probably need to scroll down to reveal). It gets the job done, but it’s not fun to look at. If you are using the file transfer option for this suite connecting via the finder or windows explorer is a better option.

The available options for cloud storage are not as great as in Quick Office. The “big three” are present, as are some other players, but that’s it. The suite, however, adds the ability to connect to a service via webDav – so “roll your own” cloud storage is an option.

Importing files into Office2 HD doesn’t render quite as good results as Quick Office. Unrecognized fonts are displayed in a sans serif font (and retained when opened elsewhere). Outline lists, however, are not displayed correctly though, again, the formatting is retained when opened elsewhere. The application handles spreadsheets well, however, and has in previous months been able to handle files which caused the other two suites to crash. It retains most cell formatting, but cannot hide cells. My first test presentation displayed with moderate success. My second test presentation removed the gradient background and didn’t handle a bullet list very well. Neither presentation retained animations.

Documents to Go

Unlike the other suites in this comparison, Documents to Go makes use of a desktop application to handle local transfers. In one sense, this can be seen as a hassle, because it requires the downloading an application to transfer documents over a local network. On the other hand, Documents to Go removes the need to manually move documents between devices (as in the other two suites). Once installed, Documents to Go’s desktop application creates a folder which will automatically sync files across devices. For uses who want to sync only on their local network, this is a good option.

Documents to Go has the least available options for cloud storage out of the three suites in this comparison. It has the big three, and adds only Sugar Sync as an alternative (each suite also offers iDisk, but this product will soon be discontinued so it can hardly be counted). It does, however, offer some special hooks for GoogleDocs users (the previously mentioned “stared documents”) – this is a nice touch.

Files imported into Documents to Go are displayed nicely. Text is re-flowed for the screen and font information is retained. I sometimes noticed a glitch in the font for outlines when a document is created in the Suite and then uploaded to GoogleDocs, which is an error which should be addressed. Also, Documents to Go has a tendency to strip out paragraph spacing when information is moved through the suite. Again, this is a glitch which I’d like to see fixed. Spreadsheets imported well, retaining cell formatting and even hiding cells which had been hidden in GoogleDocs. One of my test presentations, however, caused the application to crash.

Conclusion

Each of these suites handles importing and exporting in slightly different ways. Documents to Go allows for local syncing, which is a plus, but the added step of installing a desktop application to do so is a non-starter for many. The local file transfer feature for the other two suites is a nice touch (though the web interface is prettier in Quick Office) but requires a manual transfer of data. Again, this is a non-starter for many users.

Each suite has the “big three” cloud storage services available, but Quick Office offers the most options of all the suites. To it’s credit Office2 HD has built-in webDav support, allowing users or organizations to set up their own cloud storage services. Documents to Go has the fewest cloud storage options available, but has some key features GoogleDocs users will appreciate.

The suites each do a credible job importing word processing documents and spreadsheets, but are dismal when importing even the simplest of presentations (really, don’t even bother). The parity of features for each suite makes it difficult to declare a “winner” in this category. As a GoogleDocs user I tend to lean towards Documents to Go, but users of other cloud solutions will be happy with any of the three suites in this comparison.

Mobile Suite Showdown – Editor Features

Productivity apps on the iPad continue to be one of the top selling points for the device. It’s no surprise, then, that there are several office suites available in the App Store. This post is going to explore the three main “all in one” suites which are available on the iPad – Documents to Go, Quick Office, and Office2 HD. Apple’s iWork is also available in the App store, but the “separate app” nature of the suite sets it outside the scope of this comparison.

Each suite will be explored for file management, editor layout, editing features, and importing/exporting. We’ll primarily look at the word-processing features of each suite, but will also compare the spreadsheet and presentations modules for each app. Today we’ll be looking at the third comparison – editor features.

This installment of the series is going to be handled a bit differently. The same three suites will be reviewed, but we’ll break down the review for each module in the package – Word Processor, Spreadsheet, and Presentation.

Word Processor

This is the module I use most in any of these suites. Given that I have to write what amounts to a short reflection paper every week, this makes sense.

Quick Office

As was pointed out in the previous segment of this comparison, Quick Office HD attempted to create a simple interface which was pleasant to look at and easy to navigate. Unfortunately, the shortcomings of their interface choices also impacted the feature set they included in the suite. The word processing module can do basic character formatting, color and font changes, and simple paragraph formatting like indents and lists. It handles these tasks, decently and can interpret more complex formatting well when it’s imported into the suite, but there is no way to handle more complex formatting directly in Quick Office HD. There is no way to customize lists or add spacing between paragraphs. These are two features I use constantly, so their absense is something I feel.

Quick Office HD feels like a mobile editor, which is odd given their decision to present content in a page-layout view. It’s useful for editing existing documents, or creating documents with basic formatting, but it doesn’t seem to be designed for complex projects.

Office2 HD

For an inexpensive package, Office2 brings a lot of punch to the features debate. This suite handles all the basic formatting covered by Quick Office HD. It also, however, has an excellent slate of advanced formatting features. Paragraph spacing, line spacing, columns, manual breaks and tab stops, and full-fledged styles. While I gave Office2 HD poor marks for it’s cluttered interface, it seems the developers were busy adding an insane amount of features to their product. In addition the already listed features, this suite also allows the insertion of images and footnotes into a document. Something no other application in this comparison is able to do.

The desire to have desktop-level features in their application is admirable, and it is rather amazing to have so many options available on a mobile editor. Unfortunately, some of the features feel half-baked. When version 5 first came out, the suite was sluggish – leaving many of the advanced features buried behind a frustrated waiting game. Two iterations have passed since 5.0 was released, however, and the speed has gotten better each time. In fact, Office2 is actually faster on my iPad than Quick Office HD. Other features, however, still need some work. Hanging indents on lists have a tendency to disappear once a document is closed and re-opened.

This is a suite which shows much promise – but it still needs to work out some kinks.

Documents to Go

As with layout, this suite splits the difference between the other two in this comparison. It has many of the features included in Office2 except paragraph styles, images, and footnotes. In place of these omissions, however, Documents to Go adds an extensive array of list options. This includes a good range of multi-level lists for the creation of outlines. As this is a feature I use every week, it’s something I appreciate.

Unlike Office2, the advanced formatting features in Documents to Go “just work.” The only glitch I’ve discovered so far is the omission of paragraph spacing when a document is synced and retrieved from Google Docs. This is an inconvenience, and one which I wish would be rectified, but it’s not a show-stopper.

Spreadsheet

I use spreadsheets infrequently, but when I do they are an indispensable tool for my work.

Quick Office

The Spreadsheet module in Quick Office HD is slick, fast, and intuitive. Functions are easily accessed next to the editor bar, and some basic formatting is found in the main editor window – including the option to format cell data into a pre-arranged type. Other editing includes the ability to do simple borders, change cell color, and align cells both vertically and horizontally. In fact, the same “drag to align” interface which seems unnecessarily graphic in the word processor feels elegant in the spreadsheet. Merging cells and wrapping data in a cell is also easily accomplished.

Selecting multiple cells in Quick Office HD is also easily done. When a cell is selected, a handle appears on each side which can be used to drag a selection across multiple rows, columns, or both.

Office2 HD

The spreadsheet (called “workbooks” when you create a new one) in this suite has a great many features, all accessed through the buttons on the editor toolbar. Included among these buttons are quick borders, and button which will sum all the data in a column (I love this). Data types are found under a dollar sign icon, but advanced formatting is found under an unattractive “…” icon (again, the interface needs a little work). As with the word processor, the formatting buttons span between two pages.

Selecting multiple cells isn’t initially as elegant in Office2 HD as it is in Quick Office. A basic selection requires double tapping a cell and then dragging through the cells you want – a handle appears which can be used to adjust the selection. Alternatively, however, if you tap a single cell and then long-tap another cell a range can will selected (row, column, or box depending on where you long-tap). This would be helpful when trying to select a very specific data-set in a large spreadsheet.

Documents to Go

Documents to Go has an impressive array of functions which can be done with it’s spreadsheet, and can handle basic formatting to display it’s data. Borders, however, are missing from it’s tool-set – which I find an odd omission. The spreadsheet module of this suite, however, does add the ability to hide and unhide rows and columns. This is helpful, for example, when a spreadsheet is used to create a schedule – past weeks can be hidden from view to allow the quick browsing of data.

Selecting multiple cells in Documents to Go, however, is an exercise in frustration. The feature is accessed by double-tapping a cell and then dragging. There is, however, no handle present which can later alter a selection. On large spreadsheets, this creates headaches when attempting to select data.

Presentation

My initial response to anyone wanting to use the presentation modules in these suites is, “Just use Keynote.” As they are a bundled part of the suite, however, I include them in this comparison. I won’t bother with the screenshots, though, it’s just too depressing.

Quick Office

When thinking of the presentation module for Quick Office HD the word, “rudimentary” comes to mind. It has support for the formatting of basic shapes and text boxes – and that’s it. No builds, no backgrounds, no transitions. Just the text and shapes. The purpose of this app seems to be to display, and edit, imported slides rather than build new presentations from scratch.

Office2 HD

This presentation module includes a few more features than Quick Office, including the ability to set a background image. In addition, there are some included slide templates and to import images into slides. Builds, transitions, and compositing features (such as borders and drop shadows) are not included. I also find the presentation module to be a bit unstable, as it tends to crash when inserting images.

Documents to Go

If Quick Office was “rudimentary,” the presentation module in Documents to Go is “bare bones.” There are several simple templates offered when creating a new presentation, but once created the content of the slides can only be altered via an outline view! Speaker notes can be added to slides, in the slide-view mode – but I’m not sure why anyone would bother.

If you’re not importing slides into Documents to Go, it’s best to forget this module even exists.

Conclusion

In terms of sheer features, Office2 HD dominates. It’s advanced formatting for word processing documents, and several nice touches to it’s spreadsheet module, make it come out on top. Some of the features aren’t quite stable, however, so it might be best to save often when using this suite for content generation. Over all, Documents to Go comes in second due to a stellar word processing feature-set – but Quick Office’s spreadsheet module is also a tempting offer.